Cole South: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile

Posted by: admin  //  Category: Brian Hastings, CA, CES, CardRunners, Casino, FullTilt, FullTilt Poker Tips, FullTiltPoker, Gambling, Games, Inter, Internet Poker, Object, Online, Online Poker, Other, PLO, Poker, Rakeback, Videos, Visit, ads, arctic, article, b, bankroll, book, career, cole south, d, eric liu, eve, forum, full tilt, full tilt poker, fulltiltpoker.com, game, girl, highest, ing, insight, internet, player profile, players, poker tables, press, ring games, s, south, spa, style, team, team cardrunner, team cardrunners, tilt, time, vegas, video, wedoitallvegas, work, world

Having built a bankroll of over $5 million, Cole South’s reputation as a successful high-stakes ring game player is well established among his peers. Throughout his poker career, he has enjoyed consistent success taking down massive pots at the highest-stakes ring games online.

Cole’s poker career began back in 2005, where he was playing at low-stakes tables. He steadily worked his way up to the high-stakes ring games and impressively built up his bankroll along the way.

Cole’s poker career has given him the chance to visit every continent in the world, besides Antarctica and as an instructor and member at Full Tilt Poker’s CardRunners he provides insight via his instructional videos.

When Cole is not playing poker, he enjoys spending time with his girlfriend and dog in Washington D.C.

Look for Cole at the Full Tilt Poker tables, where he is known for his hyper-loose aggressive style and his creative gameplay.

Discuss this article in our forum Discuss this article in our forum

8f866cbb8cs icon217 Cole South: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile

Related posts:

  1. Brian Hastings: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Online poker phenom Brian Hastings has swiftly and steadily…
  2. Eric Liu: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Team CardRunners member and instructor Eric Liu quickly became…
  3. Haseeb Qureshi: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Haseeb “INTERNET POKERS” Qureshi is a No-Limit Hold’em and…

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

An Academic Approach to Poker (Gets Dumbed Down)

Posted by: admin  //  Category: *the rumble, 2009 World Series, ACC, APT, Articles, CA, CES, CardRunners, Casino, EPT, Edge, Gambling, Games, IPL, Inter, Joe Cada, Kyle Siler, Las Vegas, MMA, Object, Online, Online Poker, Other, PLO, Poker, Poker Players, Shows, UB, UNC, USA Today, YES, ads, article, b, biggest, blogs, book, books, burn, challenge, champion, d, full tilt, full tilt poker, game, google, hot, house, ing, journal, jpg, literature, money, new, opponent, people, picture, player profile, players, reason, research, return, s, smart, style, team, team cardrunner, team cardrunners, theory, thoughts, tilt, winners, winning, words, work, world, world series of poker

'Journal of Gambling Studies'Noticed an item in yesterday’s USA Today about online poker, a reference to a newly-published study about online poker called “Social and Psychological Challenges of Poker” by Kyle Siler, a doctoral student in sociology at Cornell University.

As usually happens with these articles that try to summarize a discipline-specific study for a wide audience, the USA Today piece boils Siler’s article down to one simple, easy-to-digest claim, essentially announcing that it shows “Poker wins often lead to bigger losses.” In other words, the USA Today article makes it sounds as though Siler’s exhaustive study of a large sample of online poker hands proves that players who win a little tend to lose it back and then some — confirming, in a way, the fears of those who object to poker and/or gambling as an inevitable road to ruin, regardless of one’s short-term successes.

The USA Today article is accompanied by a picture of 2009 World Series of Poker champion Joe Cada, who does not actually figure in the piece. I suppose there could be some implication here being advanced about the possibility of Cada’s not holding onto his winnings, but I think it more likely this was the first available poker-related photo that came up following a quick search.

I was curious to read the study, especially because the way it was presented in the USA Today article seemed more than a little sketchy. Took a little bit of work to get a look at it, but I did manage get a copy and have now read it through.

Siler speaks knowledgeably of poker and the online game, and as far as I can tell seems to be operating within accepted expectations for sociological research and argumentation. He also shows an understanding of economic theory and applies some of those ideas when appropriate. Siler additionally brings in many references to “poker literature” — both to strategy texts and to narratives — which help ground the study within conversations about theory and practice with which we poker players who have read those books are versed. Those references to people like Sklansky, Caro, Harrington, Brunson, and others also make the article more fun for poker players to read than probably would be the case with most dry, academic treatises.

All in all, I think Siler’s article is smart and interesting, and while its findings mostly confirm ideas we already had about what strategies are most successful his study is nonetheless useful for its having found support for those ideas in the data. I also think it is obvious that the USA Today writer probably only skimmed the study, coming away with a vague, uncertain understanding of its findings.

Here, let me take a shot at summarizing this sucker a little more carefully…

“Social and Psychological Challenges of Poker” by Kyle Siler appears in the latest issue of the Journal of Gambling Studies. Using Poker Tracker, Siler examines roughly 26.9 million hands of online poker played over a five-month period at different stakes in order to try to determine “which strategies are conducive to winning at these different levels,” and therefore perhaps draw some conclusions about the “social and psychological challenges” the game presents. The game on which Siler focuses is short-handed (6-max.) no-limit hold’em, and the hands he’s looking at come from games played at NL50, NL200, and NL1000. In all, he was able to gather and analyze stats on around 295,000 different players.

After crunching the numbers with Poker Tracker, Siler reaches a few conclusions which he does a good job explaining, also using charts and graphs to help him further illustrate what he has found. Those conclusions include his having discovered that

  • “tight and aggressive strategies have the best return across all levels”;
  • one finds “an increased proportion of aggressive players as one moves up stakes,” where also “the number of passive players decreases”;
  • there is an “overrepresentation of loose and aggressive players” among the biggest winners and the biggest losers at all stakes;
  • “None of the biggest winners at any of the levels were even close to being in the top hundred win rates,” having made their money via higher volume (the “grinders”);
  • “a high win percentage (i.e. the percentage of total hands won by a player) is negatively correlated with win rate.”

  • It is this last item that I think caused the USA Today writer to stumble a bit. The point there is that in no-limit hold’em winning a lot of pots doesn’t mean one wins a lot of money, and, in fact, when one looks at millions of hands like Siler did, one discovers that the big winners tend to win fewer (though bigger) pots relative to the rest of the player pool. That correlates with the first finding, namely, that the tight-aggressive strategy has the best return.

    The USA Today writer took that point and mangled it into a declaration that “players who played a lot of hands and often won ended up losing more money than others.” He then quotes from Siler’s study in a way that makes it sound like Siler is agreeing with that somewhat vague claim, but he’s misrepresented Siler’s findings.

    Siler does conclude the study with some thoughts about how moving up in stakes presents players with new challenges, and does a nifty job relating how the stress of adapting one’s style — necessary to succeeding at the higher levels — presents especially difficult “social and psychological challenges” to poker players. He ends with the point that “the biggest opponent for many players is themselves,” an idea familiar to any poker player who has struggled to improve his or her game.

    Like I say, a smart study that I recommend if you can somehow get access to a copy. And I’m sorry to see it somewhat misrepresented in USA Today the way it was — that is, as seeming uncritically to confirm fears about poker as just another unhealthy avenue to degeneracy and self-destruction — and thereby soliciting further misinformed, unrelated comments like “this is the reason why the house always win[s]” and “that is why they call it gambling.”

    27238395 4770484892675514607?l=hardboiledpoker.blogspot An Academic Approach to Poker (Gets Dumbed Down)

     An Academic Approach to Poker (Gets Dumbed Down)

    Related posts:

    1. Mike McDonald: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Canadian poker player Mike McDonald has earned over $1.8…
    2. Mike McDonald: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Canadian poker player Mike McDonald has earned over $1.8…
    3. Dealing with regulars At the mid and high stakes, you will start…

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Eric Liu: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile

    Posted by: admin  //  Category: ACC, Brian Hastings, CA, CardRunners, Casino, Dev, EPT, Erik Seidel, FullTilt, FullTiltPoker, Games, Inter, John Juanda, Johnson Juanda, Object, Online, Online Poker, Other, PLO, Poker, Team Full Tilt Poker, Tournaments, ads, article, b, bankroll, biggest, book, career, d, eric liu, event, forum, friends, full tilt, full tilt poker, fulltiltpoker.com, game, ing, live, live poker, money, player profile, players, poker tables, poker tournament, poker tournaments, pot-limit Omaha, press, reviews, s, spa, team, team cardrunner, team cardrunners, team full tilt, tilt, time, tour, tournament, vegas, wedoitallvegas, work

    Team CardRunners member and instructor Eric Liu quickly became one of the most respected No-Limit Hold’em players around after turning a $200 deposit into an impressive $34,000 bankroll in just a few months.

    Eric’s interest in poker developed after watching a poker tournament on TV and decided to try out his poker skills firsthand. He jumped up the ranks in a very short time playing in the biggest No-Limit Cash games online and more recently playing in live poker tournaments. His biggest win to date came in 2008 when he finished in-the-money at an EPT event in January of that year.

    When not at the poker tables, Eric spends his time studying at Duke University, where he is finishing up his senior year. Additionally, Eric devotes a great deal of his time doing volunteer work, traveling and spending time with friends.

    Look for Eric online playing at Full Tilt Poker’s high-stakes No-Limit Hold’em and Pot-Limit Omaha tables.

    Discuss this article in our forum Discuss this article in our forum

    Read more about Eric’s accomplishments at Full Tilt Poker

    8f866cbb8cs icon5 Eric Liu: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile

    Related posts:

    1. Brian Hastings: Team CardRunners Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Online poker phenom Brian Hastings has swiftly and steadily…
    2. Erik Seidel: Team Full Tilt Poker Player Profile ull Tilt pro Erik Seidel began his career playing…
    3. John Juanda: Team Full Tilt Poker Player Profile Born as Johnson Juanda in Medan, Indonesia, John Juanda…

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Hard-Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (3 of 3)

    Posted by: admin  //  Category: *the rumble, 2009 WSOP, 2009 WSOP Main Event, 2009 WSOPE, 2009 Year in Review, 2010 WSOP, 2010 WSOP Schedule, 311, Ask, Barry Greenstein, Barry Shulman, Betting, Billy Kopp, Bloggers, CA, CES, CardRunners, Casino, Cheating Scandal, Cher, Comeback, Confessions, Cowboys Full, Daniel Negreanu, Doyle Brunson, EPT, ESPN, Entertainment, Events, FilmChaw, Final Table, Fox, FullTilt, Gambling, Gambling Sites, Harrah’s, Hove, Inter, Isildur1, James McManus, Jeff Shulman, Joe Sebok, John Cage, Jordan Smith, Million Dollar Challenge, NFL, New Year, News, Object, Olly, Online, Online Poker, Other, PEAT, PLO, Patrik Antonius, Phil Gordon, Phil Hellmuth, Phil Ivey, Poker, Poker Hall of Fame, Poker Players, Poker Tips, Poker2Nite, PokerNews, PokerStars, Roland de Wolfe, Scott Huff, Shopping, Sports, St. Augustine, Tactic, Television, The Godfather of Poker, The Invention of Lying, The Seventh Seal, The World Series, Tobias Reinkemeier, Tommy Angelo, Twitter, UB, UIGEA, UNC, UltimateBet, Victoria, Victoria Coren, Visit, WCOOP, WSOP, WSOP Schedule, YES, ads, america, auto, b, balloon boy, barcelona, betfair, biggest, blogs, book, books, burn, business, cast, challenge, champion, championship, cheating, d, days, december, europe, event, final, full tilt, game, gaming, gold, google, green, heads-up, hellmuth, history, hot, house, iMEGA, ing, internet, interview, jordan, jpg, kentucky, law, life, main event, marvel, match, media, movies, nato, new, november, november-nine, october, offer, online gambling, people, person, players, poker books, poll, railing, reading, running, s, schedule, stack sizes, style, tennis, texas, thanksgiving, things, thoughts, tilt, time, upcoming, vegas, wbo, winners, world, world series of poker, writing, wsop main event, wsope, wtf

    We are almost there. The last day of the year. How are things stacking up for you, in terms of your win/loss total for 2009? Don’t do anything silly today to try and manipulate it into something you like better.

    Me? I might play a little today, but I have a lot of other writing to do, including finishing this here recap. Following Part 1 (Jan.-Apr.) and Part 2 (May-Aug.), here’s the rest of the story:

    September

    I Get Up, I Get DownIn UIGEA news, a lawsuit brought by the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) that challenged the law’s constitutionality was dismissed. This story was strangely spun by many (in particular, iMEGA) as good news because in rejecting the case the 3rd Circuit District Court made reference to the fact that individual states get to say what is and what is not unlawful internet gambling.

    Fact was, this distinction had been noted in the UIGEA all along (i.e., this new case didn’t really change anything on that front), something I pointed out in “iMEGA Suit Claiming Unconstitutionality of UIGEA Dismissed.”

    During the first part of September I was occupied with helping cover PokerStars’ World Championship of Online Poker (WCOOP), and so there were a few posts this month reporting various happenings there. In the last one of those posts, I was inspired to comment on the repeat successes of guys like Daniel “djk123” Kelly, Bertrand “ElkY” Grospellier, and Yevgeniy “Jovial Gent” Timoshenko in “PokerStars WCOOP Concludes: It’s a Skill Game, Jo.”

    Was watching the U.S. Open in there, too, and in “Matching Up Poker and Tennis” I attempt to draw an analogy that addresses the old luck-vs.-skill debate in poker. “The Poker Hall of Fame: Will Anyone Be Worthy?” notes how the new voting procedure appeared to guarantee that either no one or just one person would get in this year. And “When Winners Lose, and Losers Win” relates the story of that wild hand at EPT Barcelona between Tobias Reinkemeier and Roland de Wolfe in which de Wolfe mucked a winner.

    As far as my own play was going, I was running good in August and early September, partly evidenced by “Shovels, Clovers, Valentines, and Squares” in which I tell about flopping a straight flush. Then hit a bad patch, some details of which I shared in “I Get Up, I Get Down.” I also see that I began and ended the month with a couple of posts about stack sizes in PLO: “Topping Off” and “Don’t Want No Short People ’Round Here?”

    September also saw the Kahnawake Gaming Commission issue its so-called “final decision” on the UB insider cheating scandal, which I talked some about in “Final Decision on UltimateBet: None of My Business.” And, as you’ll recall, soon after came “The Sebok Surprise” in which the well-liked pro signed on with the beleaguered site.

    October

    The balloon we thought was carrying a boyThe month began with the conclusion of the World Series of Poker Europe Main Event, in which Barry Shulman enjoyed a couple of fortunate hands against Daniel Negreanu heads up to take it down. Talk about that some in “End of Story: 2009 WSOPE Main Event Concludes.”

    Then our attention gradually turned toward Vegas and the upcoming conclusion of the WSOP Main Event. On October 7 I noted there was just “One Month Left to Hype the November Nine.” I think Harrah’s, ESPN, et al. ended up doing okay during those next few weeks to get us all (and others) interested in the sucker come November. Case in point, a week later in “That’s the Way We Do It” I admit how I was starting really to get into the ESPN broadcasts of the Main Event. And near the end of October I was marveling with everyone else at that hand in which Phil Ivey mistakenly mucked his flush, giving Jordan Smith an undeserved pot in “Not Exactly Ivey League.”

    These posts from October all have self-explanatory titles, I think: “PokerStars Million Dollar Challenge Debuts,” “The Poker Hall of Fame: Sexton Selected,” and “Kentucky Still Hoping to Be Master of Your Domains.” Well, maybe I should explain that last one. Had to do with the still-ongoing appeal of the appeal, now being considered by Kentucky’s Supreme Court, in that case regarding the commonwealth’s desire to block or seize domains hosting online gambling sites.

    Then there are some posts in there with titles that definitely need explainin’. “Playing As If Your Life Depended On It” made references to both Tommy Angelo and The Seventh Seal. “Up, Up, and Away!” concerns our friend “balloon boy” (remember him?). And “Call and Response” does a little theorizin’ about the significance of blogs, Twitter, and how we use this here interweb to relate to each other.

    Early in the month I made it to the movies to see a decent comedy called The Invention of Lying. I reviewed that one over on Film Chaw, then wrote about it here, too, in “First, the Invention of Lying; then, the Invention of Poker.” That post caused me to evoke James McManus’ new book (which I was reading at the time), Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker. I’d eventually review it here in “A Good Read: McManus Tells the Story of Poker.” Soon I’d additionally get the chance to review Cowboys Full more formally over on the Betfair site, where I’d also interview McManus.

    November

    First half of November was all about the WSOP Main Event final table. In “Post-Production is 20/20” I talked some more about Ivey’s mistake versus Jordan Smith, including sharing Barry Greenstein’s thoughts on the matter. Then in “Kopp Busted!” I talked about seeing ESPN’s coverage of another crazy hand, the one in which Billy Kopp lost it all to Darvin Moon with just a dozen players left.

    Then we finally got there. In “2009 November Nine Just Hours Away… Time for Special Tactics!” I talked a bit about Phil Hellmuth saying he’d coached Jeff Shulman to employ a “special tactic” to “shock the world.” Then I gave an overview of the nine players at the final table in “2009 WSOP Main Event Final Table: Welcome Back, November Nine.”

    Discussed that bizarro Hand No. 90 in which Darvin Moon made the big bluff then folded for next-to-nothing to Steve Begleiter in “Moon Begs the Question… WTF?” Wrote about the heads-up match a bit in “Comeback Kid Cada 2009 WSOP Main Event Champ,” then a few days later offered “Kudos to Cada: WSOP Champ on Letterman.” A final November Nine post, “Looking Back: 2009 WSOP November Nine on ESPN,” includes a list of the 32 (of 364) final table hands that made it into the two-and-a-half hour long ESPN broadcast.

    You’ll recall it was just a few days later we learned “Pollack Moves On, WSOP Commish Seat Open.” Harrah’s still hasn’t filled that seat, and toward the end of the month I asked “Does the WSOP Need a Commish?”

    Let’s see… the weird-ass juxtaposition of the month award goes to the post “The Sklansky Minute and John Cage’s Indeterminacy.” (See that one for yourself, if yr curious.) And “$1,356,946.50” relates how I happened to have been railing Isidur1 and Patrik Antonius when I saw them play the biggest pot in online poker history.

    As the month concluded, we American online poker players were all fretting about the upcoming December 1 deadline for enforcement of the UIGEA. I wrote “The Door is Closing: Hoping for UIGEA Delay,” then the next day (Thanksgiving) got to say “Thankful, I Am” as we’d heard that indeed there’d be a six-month postponement of the deadline.

    December

    Full Tilt: Admit OneMonth began with that House hearing on online gambling, discussed in “Talking Online Poker: House Hearing Today.” Then everybody put the subject on hold. ’Cos, you know, there was shopping to do. Oh, and that health care thing.

    Read a couple more poker books near year’s end, both autobiographies. I’d review Doyle Brunson’s The Godfather of Poker over at Betfair, but also wrote a piece here — “Doyle Brunson’s Confessions” — in which I talked about how the book reminded me more than once of St. Augustine’s autobiography. (Not saying Doyle’s a saint, haha!) I also wrote here a “Poker Book Review: Victoria Coren’s For Richer, For Poorer: A Love Affair With Poker” — a funny, even “literary” book I’d think should appeal to any poker player who likes good storytelling.

    Opined a bit on Scott Huff and Joe Sebok’s new Fox Sports show in “Poker2Nite Brings Poker to the World.” The post “Speaking of Poker: What You Can and Cannot Say, Part II” is also about their show, revisiting an old topic regarding the conflict between online poker sponsorships and television.

    Mid-month saw the “2010 WSOP Schedule Announced,” inspiring a bit of photshopping (see below). In much less significant news, I finally got response to my repeated requests to UltimateBet which I related in “The Rest of the Story (UB Hand Histories).”

    Of course, the big poker story in December was the ongoing Isildur1 saga, and I wrote about it a few times here.

    “Out of This World: The Isildur1 Saga Continues” discusses Patrik Antonius’s interview with Phil Gordon about the mystery man while also pointing to some other stories then swirling about. In “Loving Life, Defying Death” I talked about railing Isildur1 a bit while also referring back to Doyle Brunson’s book (and the weird, repeated joke of some railbirds prematurely announcing Texas Dolly’s death). “Digging for Gold (Mining Isildur1)” took up the new controversy regarding the CardRunners guys’ collecting info about the sneaky Swede. Then came PokerNews’ interview with Isildur1 in which revealed he planned to pursue a “formal complaint.” I suggested “Grab Your Popcorn (Isildur1 v. Full Tilt).”

    2010: The Year We Make ContactSo that’s what’s been happenin’ here. No telling at the moment what 2010 will be like for yr humble gumshoe, but I imagine continuing to scribble away here will most definitely be part of the plan.

    Big thanks again to everyone for coming around here and for all of the nice feedback. Be sure and make contact again in 2010. Have a safe and happy new year, all!

    27238395 6916223982231127735?l=hardboiledpoker.blogspot Hard Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (3 of 3)

     Hard Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (3 of 3)

    Related posts:

    1. Hard-Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (3 of 3) We are almost there. The last day of the year….
    2. Hard-Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (1 of 3) Wait a minute. You telling me it is almost…
    3. Hard-Boiled Poker 2009 Year in Review (2 of 3) Continuing what we started yesterday … …

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Grab Your Popcorn (Isildur1 v. Full Tilt)

    Posted by: admin  //  Category: *high society, 2 Million, ACC, Brian Hastings, Brian Townsend, CA, CES, CardRunners, Casino, FullTilt, FullTiltPoker, Games, IPL, Inter, Isildur1, J.R.R. Tolkein, News, Object, Online, Online Poker, Other, PLO, PPA, Poker, Poker Players, Poker Rooms, Poker Sites, PokerNews, PokerStars, SEC, Shopping, UB, Vera Valmore, WSOP, YES, ads, b, blogs, book, burn, d, energy, family, final, folks, forum, full tilt, full tilt poker, fulltiltpoker.com, game, gold, google, group, information, ing, interview, interviews, jpg, listed, money, money list, new, online poker sites, person, players, reason, running, s, security, spa, style, summer, team, tilt, time, trip, triple, winning, words, world

    Full Tilt: Admit OneSpent most of yesterday running around seeing family and doing some last minute shopping. I did, however, try to monitor from time to time what folks were saying about the PokerNews interview with the still-unidentified Isildur1 that appeared yesterday. You know that name “Isildur” is a Lord of the Rings thing, right? This sucker is turning into a regular triple-feature.

    I saw threads continuing to lengthen on the forums as the debate persists regarding what indeed might have happened prior to Brian Hastings’ huge $4.2 million winning session versus Isildur1 on 12/8/09. Still a lot of energy among the posters going back and forth with arguments over whether or not Hastings unduly benefited from information about Isildur1’s play prior to the session.

    For most, the issue concerns Full Tilt Poker’s admonition, listed in its “Site Terms,” against players gaining “an unfair advantage” by “accessing or compiling information on other players beyond that which the user has personally observed through his or her own game play.” Statements by Hastings following the session alluded to his having seen reports on Isildur1’s play that had been compiled by his friend and fellow CardRunners pro Brian Townsend. (See yesterday’s post for more specifics.)

    Adding to the intrigue, Full Tilt Poker’s Fraud and Security Team conducted an investigation of the matter, including interviewing Hastings, Townsend, and Cole South, and determined that neither Hastings nor South were guilty of any violations of FTP’s terms. Townsend, however, was found to be guilty of “datamining,” and has thus been stripped of his Red Pro status on Full Tilt Poker for one month.

    Not the first time Townsend has violated FTP’s rules, incidentally. You might recall how late last summer (2008) Townsend admitted to having created and played under multiple accounts (though not simultaneously) on both Full Tilt Poker and on PokerStars. For that transgression, Full Tilt revoked Townsend’s Red Pro status for six months.

    Interestingly, Townsend’s explanation at the time concerned the fact that he had been experiencing a downswing and was thus forced to play lower stakes games than he normally did. “The reason why I created these accounts,” wrote Townsend on his blog, “was because I enjoy anonymity when playing smaller and am very prideful in what I do.” (Townsend also spoke with PokerNews’ Gloria Balding at the time regarding the issue.) In other words, it was a desire to remain anonymous and not have players whom he faced know that he was Brian Townsend — a.k.a., the former phenom “sbrugby” who a year or so before had suddenly turned up at the high-stakes games to take on the big boys (much like Isildur1) — that motivated him to create and use the additional accounts.

    If you’ve read the interview with Isildur1 from yesterday on PokerNews, you saw that the unknown Swede is considering filing a “formal complaint” with Full Tilt Poker regarding the session with Hastings. It almost sounds as though he hadn’t contemplated doing so until after having been told of Full Tilt Poker’s policies and their potential application to his session with Hastings. He also notes in the interview that he does not plan to play on Full Tilt Poker until he hears back regarding his complaint.

    Not sure how far Isildur1 will get with his query, but I’m most certainly intrigued to watch what happens next. As I noted yesterday, the “Site Terms” at Full Tilt Poker as well as similar terms that exist at other online poker sites certainly include a number of essentially ungovernable prohibitions, thus creating a lot of ambiguity among many regarding their efficacy. It is interesting to think how a person’s voluntary publicizing of information regarding his play (e.g., Hastings’ post-session interviews) can invite such scrutiny — not to mention the potential for punishment.

    In other words, as many poker players already know full well, it usually pays to keep quiet.

    Such was Isildur1’s strategy until yesterday. Like most, I’m curious to hear more from the Swede, and apparently more is to come over on PokerNews. However, I wouldn’t blame him should he decide to resume his former policy of keeping mum. The safer path, it seems.

    (I’m not big on Tolkein minutiae, but I guess his Isildur was finally taken down by a group of attackers after taking a less safe path.)

    27238395 843220793565260581?l=hardboiledpoker.blogspot Grab Your Popcorn (Isildur1 v. Full Tilt)

     Grab Your Popcorn (Isildur1 v. Full Tilt)

    Related posts:

    1. Digging for Gold (Mining Isidur1) Was talking to Vera Valmore yesterday about the latest…
    2. Out of This World: The Isildur1 Saga Continues So Brian Hastings, a senior at Cornell University, is…
    3. WSOP 2009 Full Tilt Money List Full Tilt Poker has just released their money list…

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.